Thursday, May 5, 2011

Grace

Grace : Akshaya Trithiya Day article for the blog.

Today is Akshaya trithiya day: It is a day when both luminary planets the Sun and the Moon are in their exaltation signs. It is also the beginning of “krita yuga” and the day Lord Ganesha starts writing the Puranas, being dictated by Veda Vyasa.

In the religious/spiritual/and even mundane levels, it is believed that anything started today endures; as the name “akshaya” means one which does not decay…..the materially inclined buy Gold, conduct mass marriages (in remote areas of India) and for the spiritual lot, initiation into a mantra is considered very auspicious.

Having lost the full steam of recent past in blogging articles after the arrival of the contents in a book form, I thought the best way to get back to the old habit is to start today and the topic “grace” would be the most apt, I imagined, as in our perpetual jignyaasaa for enlightenment, His Grace has to be “akshaya”. So folks here I go, and hope that my enthusiasm rubs on some of you and the blog continues to get contributions and helps us all in our journey towards that final beatitude.

Some time back, I had come across an article where a Western author had written about the word “grace” having no parallel in Sanskrit in the way it is understood by all of us. Unfortunately I am unable to trace this piece but since this came to my mind, I asked some including our “mama” in Chennai, who to my mind is quite unparalleled in his knowledge of the Sanskrit knowledge besides our Texts. Perhaps getting no response is also a “grace” from Him, as this continued to agitate my mind for the last few days, till last night over a disturbed sleep, I thought I had some vague answers, which I felt like sharing.

Surprisingly, however, in the morning when I checked the Sanskrit-English dictionary, to find the meanings of all the words that sprang to my mind for the English word “grace” namely “krupa” “Anugraha” and “prasadaha” none had “grace” as one of the unequivocal meanings, listed. This dictionary let me assure is considered as one of the best.

The dictionary meaning of the word “grace” on the other hand fits exactly into our understanding of what we presume the Sanskrit words imply, namely “Divine favor inspiring influence –state of receiving this”. Notwithstanding this, I am still left with the feeling that while the profound meaning of the word “grace” is not readily found in the Sanskrit parallels, our texts offer a better understanding of the profoundness of the word. Let me elaborate:

Imagine say a terminally sick man going to Sai Baba, the latter just touches him, and miraculously the man is cured. We have come across such stories. Take for instance the stories in the bible. A blind man is goes to see Jesus, is then touched by the Lord, and lo behold - a miracle- the poor fellow is able to see. As per the author, our understanding of these must be “grace”.

Remember the kindergarten sloka “mookam karoti vaachalam… etc” ? The translation is I bow down to the lord whose compassion makes the lame climb over the hills, and the dumb to be able to speak. These are exact parallels to the cited examples. The words are clearly “Yath krupa” meaning pity, compassion. Definitely not “grace”

Let’s turn now to “prasadaha” . In the gita 18th chapter, 73rd sloka, Arjuna says that by your Prasada all my desires have perished, and I have “remembered” ( obtained smriti- smiritirlabdha), clearly establishing the fact that prasadaha here means “grace” –as one should understand namely Lords divine favor inspiring influence, and a state of receiving that. One of the dictionary meaning is propitiousness -favorable to a purpose, which is very close to English "grace".

(Incidentally after this realization, having got into that undoubtedly blissful state of non-dual “oneness” with Him He says “now I shall obey your command”.)

Take the instance of “dhruva swamy” . The Lord in all His splendor, appears before the child of 5 and odd, and the child is speechless. The Lord just touches him, and there is a transformation; there comes forth a terrific eulogy of the Lord from the child. Again truly Lords “grace”.

Which brings me to the point I want to make; Whether one wants His grace merely to get rid of a handicap (which to our minds and the Sanskrit language is just compassion) or one would like to transcend from this to a state where there are no longer doubts, one remembers where he/she came from and where one has to go, and be in that state of oneness with Him, all of which again depend on His grace, is indeed one’s individual choice. The interpretation of the word is left to the context.

This however begs a few more questions. Why does a man who has realized, say a Shankara, who in pure Bhakthi -which surely pre-supposes a dual relationship- eulogize the Lord? And is this Bhakthi same as one who does “jay jay vital” to earn every conceivable material benefit. To me answers are simple. Since all experience cease once you reach the “I am Him” stage, a dual relationship with Him is a considered choice just to experience bliss in unalloyed Bhakthi like say gopikas with Krishna, A Narada in his Bhakthi treatise going by his name, or a Shankara eulogizing the lords, or our own acharyals doing puja more for their pleasure than for our benefits etc , or perhaps like Arjuna who just enjoys obeying Krishna. This is not the “Thursday bhajans” of the neighborhood, period.

And pray what is the lesson for me? While I am fascinated with the idea of self- realization, and will love to seek His prasada on a perpetual basis till I get my smriti back, I need an overdose of His “krupa” for my yogakshemam to sustain this pursuit, and all my actions while they have the former as the ultimate goal, still seek the latter to overcome/bear handicaps in multidimensional forms that He chooses to visit me.

Make sense? Please respond with comments……

Love Vichu

3 comments:

  1. Sahab,

    Classic piece as usual. Surely makes sense, except that the last para was a solid one!

    Surely there is a difference with the Thursday bhajans. I think that is also why someone like me is unable to appreciate the temple queues, while also being totally un-'realise'd!

    Am sure His 'krupa' will be on you always, if only because you take time to share your insights with us!

    I have read many versions of your "a considered choice just to experience bliss in unalloyed Bhakthi".

    There is another similar 'insight'. I think it is in the Rig Veda, that a similar 'desire', but this time 'experience ITSELF as a distinct entity' was the reason the Brahmam decided to take different forms. The 'duality' came about thence. I got this bit from the German philosopher Hegel actually!

    Probably explains why the 'realized' would still prefer to 'adore'.

    Btw, two side requests from your piece:

    1. What is 'exaltation' of the 'grihas'? Hence also debilitation. Is it pure mythology or astronomy also? Hence also why / how it affects people's lives?

    2. I thought Ganesha was a scribe for VV's 'out-pouring' of the Mahabharata. Shed light - is this part of the Puranas? Or a separate commission!?!

    You can label answers to these separately.

    Yours,

    Anand

    ReplyDelete
  2. bhai saheb Aise hi respond karte jayiye. It feels wonderful, thanks.

    The debilitation/Exaltation places of gruhas to the best of my knowledge are found in "astrolgical" treatises, which may or may not be astronomically explained, though I have heard Jindas mentioning about their significance in the latter also. I will have to revert on these.

    The sanskrit translations for these two terms are "uchhaha" and "Neechaha". In my own maverick way I tend to regard the word "neechaha" as "mean" rather than debilitated, unless astronomically there is some basis. Similarly "exalted" would mean a graceful and a higher status rather than "strong". These are my interpretations, and puritans may frown. But let that pass.

    having said that the subject of astrology itself -to my belief- is more for the purposes of knowing one's prarabda and take appropriate steps to overcome those in one's journey towards that final destination. If this premise is taken, then when you find benifics like Sukra (venus) and Jupiter Exalted where it would mean they by and large deny material benifits, and tell one who is reading the horoscope, that the subject is made for a more spiritual pursuits. Where as when they are debiltated or Neecha, one can presume that the subject is going to be attached to material comforts rather that any great attachment to things spiritual. Incidentally their exaltation points are both termed "moksha" sthanams in the 4 purushaarthams namely dharma artha, kama, moksha. Take however the planet Mars- considered a malefic, he is exalted in an "artha" sthanam, which would probably shower enormous benefits say in Sports etc ( A tendulkar will have Mars exalted). He is neecha in Moksha sthanam!!

    A neecha Venus is to my view very good in making one proficient/well known in Music. A neecha Guru will probably tempt you with matl benefits.

    These of course are quite contrary to traditional wisdom and what is available in print from so many of the experts. What is my fun if I accept this without demur!! But this will at least give you an idea about there being special significances.

    Just probaly bolstering my point; if you take Lord Rama's Jadhgam, he had Guru and Venus in Exaltation besides three others, namely Sat, Mars and Sun. Venus and Guru did not give him either great prowess in Music or arts nor did he have a sixteen thousand wives as Krishna. Guru gave Him Gyaan at the age of 6 from sage Vashisht Whiile the malefic Mars made him a great warrior, Saturn made him popular with his subjects, and Sun made him a Super King. All malefics and exalted.

    I am sure Ravan would have had quite an opposite combination.

    I am still learning boss, and I do hope you are able to make some sense out of all these.

    As regards VV to Ganesh, I thought all the 18 puranas were written with the latter's help.On the mahabharatha whether it is part of these let me revert. I may be wrong, but then what did Lord ganesha start on krutha yugadi day?

    You can also throw some light if you can.

    Love

    Vichu

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anand: Surprisingly no rejoinders. You are right. VV's Mahabharatha it was, which was penned by ganesha, as per legends. But I do recollect having read somewhere that Puranas were started to be written on the AT day. I am quite sure now that I am probably wrong.
    The only conclusion is that it was Mahabharatha, which was started to be penned down by Ganesha on Akshaya tritiya day, but not necessarily in "kruta Yuga".

    Incidentally Mahabharatham I am told is a "itihasa" or history and not part of "puranas". Any rejoinders?

    Please be in touch....

    Love

    Vichu

    ReplyDelete