Experience of Insensitivity – A short Story
Mani was a child prodigy in Carnatic Music. By the age of
five, he could recognize ragas, could translate tunes into its “swara” forms
and his singing was just amazing. He was however born to a poor family in Benares,
and his father was a priest in a local temple.
Without a kind patron/promoter his enormous talent was not exposed
beyond the city. He took lessons from a well-known teacher - Murthy - who had
retired after a long and fruitful association with Delhi’s elite whose
daughters had immensely benefited from his tutelage. To be Murthy’s student was
a sure shot at recognition of talent.
A distant relative of the family –Parameswaran- who lived in
Delhi was a fairly senior Government official. The position entitled him to a comfortably
large government allotted bungalow. He was not only an ardent music lover, but a
keen promoter of talent and many struggling artists were benefited by his
introduction to a larger audience.
He therefore invited Mani -who was now a 12 year old- and
his father to be his guest for a few days. He had decided that Mani’s
prodigious talent needed an exposure and was determined to provide it. With his
clout, he could persuade the local guys to accompany him in Violin and
Mridangam. And to cap it all he managed to have TBK (Thiruvengadam Bala
Krishnan) – the very popular music critic – to attend and listen-in to this
boy’s performance.
TBK was a bit of an egotist, hugely pragmatic and one who
knew precisely how to be in the news and be popular. He had a terrific gift of
the gab, and his writings were beautifully embellished with the best of
language finery. So not only was he a terrific company, but his critiques were
read with respect for his views and loved for its beauty in writing style. He could
be extremely scathing about one whom he did not like and profusely euphoric
about another who is a part of his benign dispensation.
One of his admirers jokingly mentioned to him one day that the
initials of his name stood for “truth, beauty, and kindness” and the title TBK
stuck. The unfortunate reality was that this man was selectively truthful, was
far from being handsome, and could be extremely unkind to any one he did not
much fancy, being very economical with truth when he was in a mood to condemn.
So much so, that he slowly started loving his writing style more
than his main job namely critiquing of someone’s music. The latter almost became
incidental. He precisely knew who were to be eulogized and who were to be
targeted as “less than mediocre”. And because he seemed to know the public mood
well, he continued to hog the popularity charts, thanks both to his
conversational and writing skills.
Mani selected a not-so-brisk style for his rendition, much
against the current trend of the Carnatic music listeners of the day, namely a
brisk style. His chosen pace - he felt - however brought out the essence of
Raaga, more soulfully in which even one remotely conversant with Carnatic
music, could sink in and enjoy besides maintaining a tempo.
His presumption was not far off the mark. The performance
soon warmed up and the main piece in Raga “mohanam” was simply superb. For some
strange reason however, TBK had let bias, overtake reason, and was almost
determined not to be overly pleased. Later, after the concert, during a chat with
the boy, in the same kind of a mood, he made an indiscreet reference to the then
popular singing duo of Chitra/Prabha whose style was “brisk”. He even ventured
to ask the boy whether he had ever heard them.
The boy turned out to be an embodiment of humility. He said,
not to have known or heard of the artistes TBK had mentioned, would be
unthinkable for anyone who loves music. He also added that he knew that the
pair was quite famous in Delhi, and since it would have been imprudent for him
to emulate their style here, he chose the less brisk style he had learnt from
his guru Murthy-Sir, who incidentally was from Delhi. The name Murthy had a bit
of a sobering effect on TBK, but he was still not prepared to give this boy a
great review. He muttered something about his performance being good and wished
him well in his long journey towards success.
Prameswaran and others who heard this conversation were more
than shocked, they were dismayed. While it was impossible to imagine that
someone could find the concert being anything but superb, they were also worried
immensely; a bad review from him could ruin the boy’s progress. Lack of
sensitivity from TBK was appalling.
The review came a few days later; a routine write-up,
lacking in substance and giving the reader an impression that this was one of
those affairs where someone wanted to promote some young boy from a small city,
and nothing substantial beyond. There was of course some sop at the end with a “fairly
good” kind of a comment about the piece in “mohanam”. It was too difficult to
believe, that TBK could just dismiss an almost divine performance, in such
frivolous manner.
Someone pointed out later that the critic had missed out on
a performance of a relative of a popular star that day, and was probably ruing
the fact. By giving such a verdict he had a chance to later explain his absence,
and bolster the argument that the decision to go to the other concert was plain
stupid. Nobody wanted to buy this theory, though his bad review was beyond understanding.
It was about a year from this episode, when in a TV program there
was a discussion about “Relevance of Traditional Music” in the context of so
much of film/fusion/ rock etc kind of very attractive options for the young. In
the Panel was the veteran Carnatic vocalist Bhashyam Iyengar, Hindusthani
classical legend Vilayat Khan Hydari, besdides some known film music directors
and our own great TBK.
During the debate Vilayat Khan who belonged to Benares,
referred to a young boy of 13/14 in his city who was a Carnatic music vocalist.
His music -according to him – however transcended Carnatic/Hindusthani kind of
barriers, and was “sublime”. He had heard him in Benares and had no doubt the
boy had “Allah’s” blessings. His name –he added- sounded something like “money”
or something, and concluded that so long as there are such divine singers,
traditional music cannot die. He however lamented that such talents remain
hidden from big cities and unless efforts are made to bring these greats into
limelight, there could well be death knells for traditional art, with so much
tamasha swarming the entertainment world.
Bhashyam Iyengar echoed similar views, and said he had heard
the boy once, and added –to the great surprise of TBK- that what he liked about
the boy was his ability to sing all styles slow, not-so-brisk, and brisk, all effortlessly
and making it very difficult to judge which style suited him better. He
referred to him as an Avatar. He was also pained to see that there were no
takers for this talent in the “sabhas”.
The TV anchor Dileep Tendulkar then sprang a surprise; he
produced in the TV studios our prodigy Mani -the boy- these two greats had
referred to. TBK, for once in his life felt
almost ashamed. He had missed an opportunity to be the hero who brought out
this prodigy into limelight. He had heard him before and out of sheer stupidity
almost rubbished him at that time. He now could only hope that no one else
really knew or could remember anything about that earlier episode.
Mani was asked to speak a few words; he said he was much
more at ease with singing and sang a sloka in raag “Kamas” leaving no one in
any doubt that here was a prodigy amongst all of us. After the show Dileep
cornered TBK and wondered as to how he could fail to recognize such talent
almost a year back, and do a review which such insensitivity and in blatantly
poor taste. It was with great difficulty that TBK extricated himself from
Dileep, but only after some damage was done to his reputation that day.
The next day there was a performance of Mani organized by
the same sponsors who did the earlier evenings TV show. The style was once
again a non-brisk style and TBK in desperation to find some chink in the
fellow’s armor, asked Mani if he could sing some keertanas in the “brisk” style
later in the program.
In Carnatic music repertoire there is this famous “ragam
thaanam and Pallavi” which is considered as a piece which tests the artiste’s
capability to the maximum. Raga alapana is a melodic improvisation to create a
mood the Raga represented, in a kind of an elaborate refrain. Thaanam
represented the rhythmic version of the raga, and Pallavi was generally a
one-line composition set to a complexly rhythmic pattern and variations, in
some chosen style, slow, not so brisk, or brisk or fast paced.
Mani chose TBK’s requested style for his RTP rendition. And
the raga chosen was “thodi”; a raga in which all the notes were “short” and the
mood it generally produced was “pathos”, especially when sung in a leisurely slow
&non-brisk style. TBK was surprised therefore at not only the choice of
raga but the brisk pace as well and that too for the most important piece of
the concert.
TBK was yet to experience the genius of Mani. Mani sang as
if he had divine inspiration. Every one present there felt a churning inside
and the one line piece invoking Lord Nataraja –the king of Dance and the ever
kind- as to when He will condescend to come and give darshan, was so
overwhelming as to make one wonder whether He had come there and His very
presence was the cause for this churning they felt, the rolling over of copious
tears and not able to know precisely what was happening. This was nothing short
of delirious ecstasy.
When it ended, all felt drained off his/her energy. There
was therefore a slightly longer gap before Mani resumed his concert. He rounded
it off with a sloka in Sanskrit in blissfully soothing Kalyani – which incidentally – has all the notes “long”
making it sensually pleasing besides a few other Raags like Mohanam etc. He
chose his own medium paced style. After the cathartic Thodi in fast pace this
was a very welcome shift. The concert ended with a few rounding off light
pieces. The concert ended, and there was a moment of absolute silence as if to
respect the divinity one experienced. Then there followed a long and thunderous
applause. The audience had witnessed something close to divinity that day, and
TBK was no exception.
He went in and congratulated Mani, without forgetting to
apologize for the last time’s gaffe regarding Padma/Chitra duo’s brisk style of
singing. Mani’s response was brilliant; Sir, are you still carrying the burden
of this “brisk style singing” remark on your shoulders? At that moment TBK
realized that this boy was not an ordinary 14 year old, but an avatar as
described by Ayyangar.
To imagine that TBK redeemed himself, and Mani went on over
the years winning more hearts akin to the famous saying “all is well that ends
well” would be missing the mark completely. Life in this age is fraught with
unexpected outcomes. Mani incidentally also happened to be brilliant in
academics. He took the IIT route, went for his Masters in US and settled down
well in California US. His wife belonged to a very hugely respected and
accomplished family of musicians and who had also done her Masters in Science,
in addition to being an excellent violinist. Their son was turning out to be a
prodigy in Piano. He was onto Western classical and had dreams of becoming a
leading Conductor of orchestra – a la Zubin Mehta.
Mani and his wife performed regularly for audiences in the
US. Every musician from India who went to the US was welcome to their home in
California. The couple was also planning a Trust in India to help out deserving
boys and girls who had music in their veins.
TBK after a brief experiment with truth went back to his
trademark critiquing style and earning respect from the entertainment world which
was seriously considering an award for his lifelong contribution.
Sutradhar’s Comments:
If God chose to take an Avatar, only a few bhakths like
Parameswaran who -it would seem- will actually recognize Him. The Lord however may
prefer a Dileep Tendulkar for the formal
recognition, and introduce Him to a much larger audience, letting His Bhakths
like the Parameswarans, feel sort of left out.
After this, even to have darshan of the Lord the likes of Dileeps would
have a say.
But being true Bhakths however, while the Parameswarans would
ceaselessly trust in the Lord in the hope that He will deliver them one day,
the Dileeps would keep Him busy by trying to corner all His blessings to countless
neo-bhakths, in their worldly pursuits. Then the interpretations, acknowledgements
would start and all of them would hail these as examples of their spiritual
upliftment, individually and collectively, much to the wonderment of the
Parameswarans.
What is the original sin of these Parameswarans that they
have to come to such a pass? Will they be forever denied their desire for a
few precious moments with Him in solitude? Or will He give them some hint that
He is aware of their turmoil, and let them be conscious of His Grace, and not
be too unhappy about their inability to be physically near Him, which BTW is
not of such critical importance? Most crucially, will they ever be able to
perceive that they are always there in His radar and they are as relevant?
Ekalavya alias Vichu
Hv read this after joining the team Jignyaasaa.
ReplyDelete